Hugo

I confess to being a lifelong Martin Scorsese fan, ever since I saw Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore. I was outraged when Goodfellas didn’t win best picture or best director (Kevin Costner, really?). But the Academy has always had its prejudices and preferences, and it didn’t surprise me that Hugo didn’t win more than the five technical awards that it garnered. Until I saw it last night. Admittedly, I haven’t yet seen The Artist (I will), but it’s hard to imagine a better overall package that pays tribute to filmmaking while demonstrating exceptional filmmaking than Hugo. There were moments where the pacing was a tad off, but it kept both me and my 10-year-old (who had already seen it on the small screen) in rapt engagement, believing the magic and the time-warp of a mightily familiar Parisian train station and cityscape.

All technical wizardry aside, the story was poignant and relevant: follow your dreams, be persistent, struggle against the forces of evil and hatred. My daughter and I discussed our favorite scenes over dinner afterward: predictably, she liked when the two dachshunds become friends and then stare at the hiding Hugo, but also the flashback of the visit to the studio of glass, with live lobsters sinking through water in front of the lobster-suited actors on set. As a cinephile, I loved this sequence as well, but my favorite was when Isabelle pulls the box down from the armoire and it spills its contents, which fly around the room in vibrant animation, bringing the drawings and dreams of a long-dead creator alive for a new generation. I will admit I cried as the filmmaker rediscovered his buried past.

It is so easy to get discouraged by lack of attention, to give up on our passions in favor of practicalities. It is perhaps not coincidental that I began this blog the same day that I saw this film. Life has a way of highlighting what is most important: we just have to open our eyes.

the Louvre through the train station clock at Orsay (photo: pits47 2006)

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Hugo

  1. “Hugo” was awesome. Easily the best, most naturalistic use of 3D I’ve seen. We all loved it. I hated having the inevitable arguments with people (including, of course, my mother) whose first comment is well, it’s so unlike Scorcese – no violence. As if he were a one-trick pony (“Age of Innocence,” anyone? “The Aviator?” “After Hours?”) As if poverty, abandonment, orphanhood and loneliness didn’t do violence.

  2. Ok, now it is on my gotta do list! That is the message that I so want and need in my life. I have tried just doing what everyone else seems to be doing and it just isn’t working for me. Thank you for making your voice heard, for sharing it with the world, for making all of it more beautiful and magical! Now to find Hugo . . . .

  3. Fun to read your exceptional blog after discussing it with you last night. Also on my “must do, must see” list. Thanks!

  4. Finally saw The Artist, and I still think Hugo should have won the Academy Award for best picture. The Artist was charming, and had some nice cinematic gimmicks, but Hugo created another world in multiple dimensions with breath-taking cinematography and inventive story-telling. It was a far better homage to filmmaking, in my opinion.

LEAVE A REPLY

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s